欢迎您光临爱尚资源网,本站秉承服务宗旨 履行“站长”责任,销售只是起点 服务永无止境!

Issues addressed principles along with envy, communications, pleasure, quality of possibilities, investment-dimensions, commitment, sex, privacy, and you will identified recognition

Issues addressed principles along with envy, communications, pleasure, quality of possibilities, investment-dimensions, commitment, sex, privacy, and you will identified recognition

With regards to this research, polyamory is recognized as “the latest habit or anticipate of experiencing multiple simultaneous close matchmaking in which men and women involved consents” on the members. Research was in fact collected within an on-line review example anywhere between . Members responded a power supply out of questionnaires, and market questions about themselves and all people they’d, as well as in depth questions regarding its relationships experiences having a primary and you may a single supplementary partner simply.

The idea of a primary-second matchmaking

Participants were questioned to own initials away from partners #step one and you will #dos, then was in fact requested some questions about their relationships with these lovers. The newest survey are programmed such that this new initials per partner have been piped for the questions to avoid dilemma out-of which spouse was being inquired about. To assess presumptions about number one-second partnerships, professionals have been expected to suggest what amount of many years and days they’d held it’s place in a relationship which have mate #step 1 and you will spouse #2. Next, to assess if or not partner #step one otherwise companion #2 try said to be a primary lover, respondents were given four options: step 1 = Sure, mate (partner’s initials) was an effective pri;s initials) was a primary relationship, but I also has someone else which can be experienced pri;s initials) isn’t an initial relationship, 4 = Zero, I do not rely on https://datingranking.net/local-hookup/waco/ considering one spouse no. 1, and you will 5 = None of more than (that have a solution to describe immediately after). Lastly, participants was in fact asked to suggest whether they existed that have lover #1 otherwise spouse #dos on effortless impulse accessibility to yes or no. Such inquiries was basically presented when you look at the group questions, before presenting our very own first tips.

For the following actions, players responded for each and every concern for a few concurrent relationship couples. In the pursuing the talk from steps, “companion ()” shows the new initials of your individuals that each and every new member conveyed because the basic and second noted people.

Relationships invited and you may secrecy

A one-product scale (into an excellent 9-point Likert-types of scale, anchored step one = don’t concur after all, nine = consent completely) assessed relationships desired off members of the family (elizabeth.grams., “My family are taking from my personal experience of mate”); and out of friends (e.grams., “My buddies was taking regarding my personal reference to partner ()”) . These things was in fact supposed to be analyzed independently, since is actually created in our very own pre-joined hypotheses and analytic plan, yet not, i did mention the potential for having fun with a chemical of these factors, but because of the poor precision of those activities together (number one lover ? = .56; additional spouse ? = .59), i don’t follow the aggregate.

Participants responded a few inquiries (towards good nine-part Likert-kind of level, anchored step one = don’t consent anyway, nine = agree totally) off feel that have privacy within relationships(s). Things utilized integrated, “In the past month, my reference to mate () are magic out-of somebody,” and you will “In the past few days, We hid several things on the my personal involvement with partner () of some individuals” (primary partner ? = .66; secondary companion ? = .90) .

Financial support and you will union processes

The way of measuring resource size consisted of around three issues according to the Resource Model Size (IMS) . Situations measure the ways individuals rating limited by info about relationships meaning that the possibility can cost you of losing this new relationship (elizabeth.g., “You will find place a lot to the that it dating that i manage reduce if the dating were to stop,” “I feel very involved in our very own relationship–such as We have place a great deal engrossed,” and you will “As compared to others I know, I’ve spent a great deal within my connection with mate”); (9-part Likert-method of level, anchored step one = don’t consent at all, nine = concur completely; top spouse ? = .69; additional companion ? = .90).

注意事项:
不要在微信、知乎、QQ、内置浏览器下载、请用手机浏览器下载! 如果您是手机用户,请移步电脑端下载!
1、文稿PPT,仅供学习参考,请在下载后24小时删除。
2、如果资源涉及你的合法权益,第一时间删除。
3、联系方式:zhaokezx888@qq.com

PPT网 » Issues addressed principles along with envy, communications, pleasure, quality of possibilities, investment-dimensions, commitment, sex, privacy, and you will identified recognition

发表评论

开通VIP 享更多特权,建议使用 QQ 登录